Home
Alphabetical Index
Super Cub
DeHavilland Beaver
Cessna 180/185
Cessna Caravan
Helio Courier
Pilatus Porter
Murphy Moose
Huey Helicopters
DeHavilland Otter
Champ Citabria
Aviat Husky
Chinook / Sea Knight
Antonov An-2
Cessna 206
Beech
Maule
 DeHavilland Caribou
DeHavilland Twin Otter
Murphy Rebel
Sky Crane
Glastar / Sportsman
Cessna 170 / 172
Norseman
Zenith CH-701 / 801
Stinson
Bell 47 Helicopter
PZL Wilga
Cessna 190 / 195
Yak-40
Lake Amphibians
Stork
Boeing C-17
Kitfox
Flying Tips
Yak-12
DeHavilland  Dash 7
Grumman Goose
Avid Aircraft
Piper Aztec
Float / Sea Planes
BushCaddy
Peterson / Wren
Gippsland GA8
Dornier Do-27 / 28
Bearhawk Aircraft
Mountain Goat
Flying Helicopters
Bush Helicopters
GAF Nomad
Bell Jet Ranger
Enstrom Helicopters
Hiller Helicopters
Robinson R44 Helicopter
Schweizer 300 Helicopter
Robinson R22 Helicopter
Safari Helicopter
Hummingbird Helicopter
Britten-Norman
Mountain Flying
Learning to Fly
Short Skyvan
Sherpa
Grumman Widgeon
Arctic Tern
Get Your 2 Cents In
Aviation Oopsie
Bushwhackers Fun Page
Aerocomp Aircraft
 

Peterson (Wren)
modification of Cessna 182

This is a modification of the common Cessna 182 airframe and encompasses several different modifications to the original airframe. Todd Peterson has acquired the rights to the original Wren modifications and currently markets them under his name. The original Wren modifications involved flap and aileron modifications, canards (forward wings), and a rather bizarre looking series of stall fences on the upper surface of the main wing. The current Peterson modifications include installation of a 260 hp engine in place of the stock 230 hp engine and canard. Because of the canard, the modified Cessna can climb at lesser angles of attack than traditional STOL planes and the manufacturer claims this is an added safety feature over traditional STOL planes. Some of these planes feature reversible pitch propellers for shorter landing rolls.

Both Wren and Peterson have claimed some impressive STOL abilities over the stock Cessna 182 and while these claims are not disputed by the author, they are unverified. Take off distances of 300 feet are claimed with cruise speeds of 153 knots. The author has never encountered such a plane (either Wren or Peterson) and does not believe these modifications to be common. The author does agree with the theory of the modifications as yielding a capable STOL aircraft. Once again, however, the author is unable to verify the veracity of the claims.


ADD TO YOUR SOCIAL BOOKMARKS: add to BlinkBlink add to Del.icio.usDel.icio.us add to DiggDigg
add to FurlFurl add to GoogleGoogle add to SimpySimpy add to SpurlSpurl Bookmark at TechnoratiTechnorati add to YahooY! MyWeb